It would be nice if you could have the Fastpath account used for the Weblclient be authenticated. Users get worried having anonymous connections enabled just to use Fastpath.
Environment
None
Activity
Show:
Greg Tangey May 1, 2007 at 3:47 PM
I voted for this because i'd like to see something like this implemented.
Obviously allowing anon connections but only from a certain IP class locks it down a bit better, but still leaves the server open to users who don't have registered accounts.
The only big problem i see with what nate proposed is that it couldn't be just a 'fastpath' user because what would then happen if 2 people tried to logon?
What i think would be better is if you could not allow anon-connections, but still have a setting in fastpath that allows anon connections for fastpath only.
It would be nice if you could have the Fastpath account used for the Weblclient be authenticated. Users get worried having anonymous connections enabled just to use Fastpath.